2014年6月25日星期三

government may indeed not done trading losses

to the so-called "international" kind of goal demolition of unauthorized construction on the chaos, I am afraid to mention "the concept of the new urbanization transformation and progress." The use of executive power harm the interests of the individual or legal cheap national team soccer jerseys entity, it is a "concept of dislocation."

a $ 270 million construction project, after only three years, will be built in most of the demolition. Along the fate of "cultural landscape corridor" in Hekou County of Riverside Road, attracted wide attention. Recently, cheap football ncaa jerseys the local response to that landscape corridor is the developer of the money spent, the provincial government buy-back a significant amount of land consolidation costs, said to be both legally and value. A construction of a split between, reflect the new transition and progress in urbanization concept.

government may indeed not done trading losses, but this is clearly not a "win-win" projects. The government considered the economic accounts, it may not be able to convince people. On the one hand, the demolition of the building demolished to build not only a problem of public finances, it is a question of social wealth, even the developers throw money, "ephemeral architecture" itself is a waste. On the other hand, even if the developers "contribute to society", but the original project owners to buy the house, but it has intangible losses: 1.2 times the relocation compensation, although higher than the purchase price, but far below the current market price. Personal profit is not to say, put the "opportunity cost" how should we count? With such a precedent, but also how to give the public a stable expectations?

What's more, even in a construction of a split in the public finances is no loss, but they were all put in at least 300 million yuan of money. This money was worth it, which should not, should also have a basic judgment. The Grand Place is good to engage in large green belt is good, is not "face project", there is no public benefit, not to answer these questions, we can say that is a huge waste. In reality, from the bizarre stadiums, like the waistband city gates, this situation is not uncommon.

In fact, the key question is not how much was spent, but the blind, short-sighted urban planning. According to Xinhua News Agency reported that the project commenced in November 2009, has less than five years. And its construction scale, should also be considered a key project. Such projects were implemented, it not through rational argumentation and scientific planning? Construction of less than five years, the use of just three years of the project, it suited the "new urban development plan" or create "an international Riverside City" requirement, and really do not know the pace of development is too fast, too fast or ideas change!

should admit fast urban development, planning also requires timely change. But planners racking our brains can not engage in the decision-making, whether it is for commercial development or construction of public facilities, if not fully rational, necessity, without real research and demonstration, will inevitably result in the planning of waste. More importantly, urban planning requires a long-term vision. That "the next cheap jerseys us government a map," who want to see the "tone map" behind the huge hidden costs: the demolition of the city cheap club soccer jerseys building materials, poor public perception of managers. And that because of a new slogan, a new civil action on the big target who need to find their own urban development characteristics. To the so-called "international" cheapjerseys.us kind of goal demolition of unauthorized construction on the chaos, I am afraid to mention "the concept of the new urbanization transformation and progress." The use of executive power harm the interests of the individual or legal entity, it is a "concept of dislocation."

"of civil engineering, can not be tampered with," the room is so personal, urban construction and more the case. For those who indulge in major demolition and construction, the old saying is undoubtedly the best phrase reminder: Jing Xi resources, diligence and frugality. Commentator Shu Tianlie

没有评论:

发表评论