2014年4月26日星期六

Cui Yongyuan countercharged Fang reputation infringement claims 670000

April 21st afternoon, Beijing Haidian court issued a notice on its official micro-blog, said the hospital decided to accept Cui Yongyuan countercharged Fang Shimin (pen name Fang Zhouzi) a dispute over the right of reputation.

Haidian court micro-blog said, "Haidian court in the trial of Fang Shimin (pen name Fang Zhouzi) case of a dispute over the right of reputation in Cui Yongyuan v. Cui Yongyuan, published in the micro-blog speech Fang infringement of the right of reputation, and have been implicated in the lawsuit Cheap Kaizer Chiefs Jerseys is filed a counterclaim. After hearing both sides, the court of Haidian in Cheap Pumas Jerseys April 21st decided to accept the counterclaim, litigation and the merger trial."

for the decision of the court in Haidian, it is also the Cheap Aston Villa Jerseys first time in micro-blog give response, he said he accepted this decision, and be in court to argue Cui Yongyuan. "While I think the counterclaim and implicated relationship without the appeal, should be a separate prosecution, since the court decides to accept the counterclaim, then we will prepare in court to argue Cui Yongyuan GM survey and Cui Yongyuan public welfare fund problem."

This paper micro-blog

Beijing Haidian Court:

January 21, 2014, Haidian court accepted Fang Shimin (pen name Fang Zhouzi) v. Cui Yongyuan reputation dispute case. During the course of the trial, Cui Yongyuan delivered the speech with Fang micro-blog also infringes the right of reputation, and the grounds of appeal is implicated relation, filed a counterclaim in the Haidian court evidence within the time limit.

Cui Yongyuan filed a counterclaim, the Fang network controversy due to the two sides of the genetically modified food safety problems differ, and the battles of Fang malicious provoke, verbal attacks Cheap Galatasaray Jerseys on Cui Yongyuan. Since September 9, 2013, Fang Shimin published a large number of violations of the right of reputation of Cui Yongyuan in his speech: 1 micro-blog slander Cui Yongyuan launched public welfare Cheap Glasgow Rangers Jerseys projects; 2 to Cui Yongyuan from the Chinese Red Cross Foundation Cui Yongyuan public welfare fund "extraction" management fee of 20000000 yuan; 3 to Cui Yongyuan "small Cui investigated gene" documentary "occupation childcare" slander; 4 Cui Yongyuan to the transaction means won a prize in the "Chinese American Film Festival"; 5 to Cui Yongyuan to use the manipulation of the relationships micro-blog; 6 to Cui Yongyuan personality, said its not in the University; 7 to Cui Yongyuan for a brand of organic milk spokesman, said Cui Yongyuan "for organic food platform" etc.. Cui Yongyuan think, since 2013 September 9 Japan people made the tort remarks so far, tort micro-blog hundreds, be forwarding tens of thousands of pageviews, by the tens of millions, caused the bad social impact cannot be redeemed. As a result of the lawsuit and counterclaim in the case has implicated relation is obvious, so the counterclaim, requesting the court to judge Fang Shimin to remove the infringing micro-blog information, make an apology, eliminate the impact, rehabilitation, compensation for mental damage solatium and economic losses totaling 670000 yuan.

没有评论:

发表评论